What Does “A Plague of Rats” Mean?
“Plague” carries obvious historical weight, tied directly to rats’ long-standing association with the Black Death, the devastating bubonic plague outbreak that killed a significant portion of Europe’s population in the 14th century. The traditional explanation blames rats, and specifically fleas living on rats, for spreading the disease across the continent, a story so deeply embedded in popular history that “plague” and “rats” became almost inseparable in the public imagination.
The real story has gotten more complicated in recent years. Some modern epidemiological research has questioned whether rats alone could account for how quickly and widely the plague spread across medieval Europe, with some studies suggesting human fleas and body lice may have played a larger transmission role than previously assumed. Rats haven’t been fully cleared of involvement, but the once-simple story is now understood as considerably more complicated, a good example of how historical assumptions can shift as research methods improve, even while the word “plague” remains permanently linked to the animal in everyday language.
Example: “Historical accounts of the era almost always mention a plague of rats, though modern researchers debate exactly how central their role really was.”
Related: Collective Nouns for Mammals · What Is a Group of Rats Called?